Wow, it's fairly amazing how on-topic we still are... ten pages later... you know, it's okay to get off-topic some of the time. Or it used to be, anyway.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> ...I'd always assumed that Ponch was the reason for the leak, actually... huh. </div>[quote]
I was about to say that I agreed, but then I thought about it and I'm not sure- on the other hand, I highly doubt Ponch's behaviour is (at least solely) caused by the "leakage;" in fact, what we've heard of it (no quotes, sorry) is that after consultation with Tom they concluded that it was probably a problem of wizardry leakage. I do think the DVD player and the TV are related to the leakage; I don't think Ponch's behaviour is, because frankly the symptoms are so general and the information so sketchy that even Kit remarks that it is described as "a suite of irritatingly vague symptoms." *shrug*
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Do you think this topic scares DD?
</div>[quote] It would scare me, but I doubt she reads it except to laugh at us.
And anyway, even if it did, it's her own fault; she likes to watch us squirm. Look! According to that interview, she's been doing it for YEARS:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">>Did you ever appear as a character in one of your TREK books?
Yes. But I'm not going to discuss where. I leave it as an exercise for
the readership. Hint: I *do* appear in [John Ford's] HOW MUCH FOR JUST THE
PLANET?.
>Is John in any of your books? :-)
Yes.
</div>[quote]
Does that not remind you- like, a lot- of how she answers out questions?
Cruel, cruel, cruel. She likes to torture. (Um. not really, Diane. Obviously we enjoy it or we wouldn't talk for ten pages about it)
As for the suggestion that creation is easier than changing: to me, that soudns extremely appropriate. To anyone who's read The Book of Night with Moon (SPOILERS FOLLOW!) <span class="ev_code_WHITE">it seems to me that that would fit in very much with Rhiow's comments about the mysterious spell: (as I remember it had) huge power output and no apparent way to get it to be there apart from simply asking for it.</span> To me that would also fit comfortably in with YW-style Powers: that it's not really that hard, we just don't know how to do it. Remember, it's not supposed to be difficult, that's a result of entropy.
(or is it? is the everything has a price problem a result of the Lone One's influence or not? interesting question.)
As for the dog-wizard thing, everyone seems to be talking a lot about Kit's shapechange. But that's irrelevant here: Kit used a whalesark. You should be looking at the dangers of a Nita-style shapechange, which involved invoking some sort of kinship with the whales. (Especially because the problem with Kit becoming too whale-like was that his body would reject the whalesark and he'd turn back into a human.)
And do Tom and Carl's dogs bring stuff back from nowhere? I thought they were finders- like they "found" Nita.
(And, Ankaa, Nota's dad was talking to Tom. Not that it's, um, important or anything. <STRIKE>I'm not a minor character obsessive, or anything.</STRIKE> [/tomncarlgeek]
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> ...I'd always assumed that Ponch was the reason for the leak, actually... huh. </div>[quote]
I was about to say that I agreed, but then I thought about it and I'm not sure- on the other hand, I highly doubt Ponch's behaviour is (at least solely) caused by the "leakage;" in fact, what we've heard of it (no quotes, sorry) is that after consultation with Tom they concluded that it was probably a problem of wizardry leakage. I do think the DVD player and the TV are related to the leakage; I don't think Ponch's behaviour is, because frankly the symptoms are so general and the information so sketchy that even Kit remarks that it is described as "a suite of irritatingly vague symptoms." *shrug*
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content"> Do you think this topic scares DD?
</div>[quote] It would scare me, but I doubt she reads it except to laugh at us.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">>Did you ever appear as a character in one of your TREK books?
Yes. But I'm not going to discuss where. I leave it as an exercise for
the readership. Hint: I *do* appear in [John Ford's] HOW MUCH FOR JUST THE
PLANET?.
>Is John in any of your books? :-)
Yes.
</div>[quote]
Does that not remind you- like, a lot- of how she answers out questions?
As for the suggestion that creation is easier than changing: to me, that soudns extremely appropriate. To anyone who's read The Book of Night with Moon (SPOILERS FOLLOW!) <span class="ev_code_WHITE">it seems to me that that would fit in very much with Rhiow's comments about the mysterious spell: (as I remember it had) huge power output and no apparent way to get it to be there apart from simply asking for it.</span> To me that would also fit comfortably in with YW-style Powers: that it's not really that hard, we just don't know how to do it. Remember, it's not supposed to be difficult, that's a result of entropy.
(or is it? is the everything has a price problem a result of the Lone One's influence or not? interesting question.)
As for the dog-wizard thing, everyone seems to be talking a lot about Kit's shapechange. But that's irrelevant here: Kit used a whalesark. You should be looking at the dangers of a Nita-style shapechange, which involved invoking some sort of kinship with the whales. (Especially because the problem with Kit becoming too whale-like was that his body would reject the whalesark and he'd turn back into a human.)
And do Tom and Carl's dogs bring stuff back from nowhere? I thought they were finders- like they "found" Nita.

Comment