Yay, complexity! (It's what keeps me reading Shakespeare). And yeah, Fire and Hemlock has some strange leaps in it that even "well, it's a Tam Lin story" doesn't cover. Didn't have any problems with Dalemark, but then, I didn't see it as a series as disconnected volumes--which is why the fourth book, which desperately attempts to pull it all together in to a single narrative, can be so confusing.
Tui, Pratchett is not King of Allusions in my book (although he comes close). I'd vote for John M. Ford for that title. I love how, in How Much For Just the Planet?, DD becomes "Princess Dee Dee," Peter Morwood is "Peter Blackwood," Neil Gaiman is "Ilen the Magian," and he pulls in references to Gilbert & Sullivan, the Paramount logo, Laurel & Hardy, Alien, Dr. Wally ("Dilithium and YOU!"), Marlene Dietrich, Rawhide, and The Thirty-Nine Steps.
All in a Star Trek novel.
Tui, Pratchett is not King of Allusions in my book (although he comes close). I'd vote for John M. Ford for that title. I love how, in How Much For Just the Planet?, DD becomes "Princess Dee Dee," Peter Morwood is "Peter Blackwood," Neil Gaiman is "Ilen the Magian," and he pulls in references to Gilbert & Sullivan, the Paramount logo, Laurel & Hardy, Alien, Dr. Wally ("Dilithium and YOU!"), Marlene Dietrich, Rawhide, and The Thirty-Nine Steps.
All in a Star Trek novel.
Comment