We all know how complicated speech is. I have a theory that goes along with it. I've been thinking about what Chris McFarland was saying. Speech seems to be a giant math equation, especially when putting it into a spell.
I believe that when you say one word of speech in a spell, you must have the other. For instance, if Nita was to make up some spell to take out the garbage, she can't just say 'garbage' in speech, and expect something to happen.
That's why I think that not only speech is a math equation, but a giant grammmar problem too. Think about it, you can't have a proper sentence with one or two words. You must have the subject (noun) and predicate (action). Same with speech.
So I sugguest if you aren't that good at English and are interested in exploring Speech, you better tidy up on that!
I believe that when you say one word of speech in a spell, you must have the other. For instance, if Nita was to make up some spell to take out the garbage, she can't just say 'garbage' in speech, and expect something to happen.
That's why I think that not only speech is a math equation, but a giant grammmar problem too. Think about it, you can't have a proper sentence with one or two words. You must have the subject (noun) and predicate (action). Same with speech.
So I sugguest if you aren't that good at English and are interested in exploring Speech, you better tidy up on that!
Comment