Originally posted by bluesalamanders:
1. Define gifted.
2. Show us a valid scientific source (or rather, several) that agrees with that statement.
1. Define gifted.
2. Show us a valid scientific source (or rather, several) that agrees with that statement.
Gifted I'm not sure how I'd define it. I know CTY and such have certain top percentages of students, but that includes test taking abilities because they go off of tests such as SATs. I know personally I can prove I know stuff extremely easier in situations that are not tests...
However, I searched PubMed through the college's network from their library page (because it allows for complete reading of many though not all articles) and have found a few on Autism its relation to gifted children, as well as specific articles related to the subject
**Fitzgerald M.
Asperger's disorder and mathematicians of genius.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Feb;32(1):59-60
**Bujas-Petkovic Z.
[Special talents of autistic children (autistic-savant) and their mental functions]
Lijec Vjesn. 1994 Jan-Feb;116(1-2):26-9. Croatian.
And another one-
Gifted children with learning disabilities: a review of the issues.
Brody LE, Mills CJ.
CTY, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Many people have difficulty comprehending that a child can be gifted and also have learning disabilities. As a result, children with special needs that result from both their high abilities and their learning problems are rarely identified and are often poorly served. This article explores the current policies and practices with regard to defining, identifying, and educating this population. Recommendations are included that would help ensure that students who are gifted and have learning disabilities receive the intervention needed to help them achieve their full potential.
I have found also many on the relationship between the two focusing on the gifted. However it seems overall that its not many of the gifted people are "disabled" but many of the "disabled" are "gifted"
It all goes into people's thought of the norm I think. The idea of everyone being the same makes people define people to be "disabled" and "gifted". Truely, they are just different, and many of the different peop are different in many ways.
So overall I think that there is something in the relationship between the gifted and those with disorders, but the question is why is their this relationship.
Darryl is a representation of these people to a higher degree, and a more interesting way to red, but it is a way that makes us think about these issues.
Comment