The saddest part of all of this, is although we hold a hard Christian majority, we were built around the concept of religion and social freedom.
How are we religiously and socially free when so many people can't have the most basic of freedoms for there lifestyles? Gay marriage does not hurt anyone, but can't be recognized legally? Blind faith types seem to think religion goes well in government, but the original concept of keeping the two seperate was an act of un-biasing the government.
The majority of our forefathers were not christian. Most were deists, we had some quakers, and for the most part they were very much about letting people worship whatever they believed the way they believed it. We've lost sight of that as a country and I find that sad.
Especially when it IS based around a christian concept. The concept of the good samaritan suggests why example is better than rule.
How are we religiously and socially free when so many people can't have the most basic of freedoms for there lifestyles? Gay marriage does not hurt anyone, but can't be recognized legally? Blind faith types seem to think religion goes well in government, but the original concept of keeping the two seperate was an act of un-biasing the government.
The majority of our forefathers were not christian. Most were deists, we had some quakers, and for the most part they were very much about letting people worship whatever they believed the way they believed it. We've lost sight of that as a country and I find that sad.
Especially when it IS based around a christian concept. The concept of the good samaritan suggests why example is better than rule.

Comment