I have always been hugely against schools in the state sector selecting their pupils on the basis of academic ability. The whole point of state schools is that they are for everyone. If you have a certain state school in the area taking the most able pupils, then that means alll the other schools will end up with a sub-average group of students. (The group is sub-average, not the all the individual students). This cannot be good for the school - it means they will get lower exams results, and been percieved as a 'bad' school.
[Something I had better explain abotu the UK school system: The are three main types of school - state, public, and private.
State schools are those funded by the government, and are what most of you would call public schools. Public schools are those which are fee-paying, but will accept anyone and everyone - you just have to pay. Private schools are those which are also fee-paying, but select their pupils in some way - whether by interview or abilties or some other criteria.]
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hadrin, in Isaac Asimov's Foundation
[Something I had better explain abotu the UK school system: The are three main types of school - state, public, and private.
State schools are those funded by the government, and are what most of you would call public schools. Public schools are those which are fee-paying, but will accept anyone and everyone - you just have to pay. Private schools are those which are also fee-paying, but select their pupils in some way - whether by interview or abilties or some other criteria.]
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hadrin, in Isaac Asimov's Foundation

Comment